Verification Example - Slab on Ground - Single-Axle Loading (PCA method)

Tekla Tedds
Muokattu: 17 Jou 2024
2024
Tekla Tedds Tekla Tedds for Word

Verification Example - Slab on Ground - Single-Axle Loading (PCA method)

Description

This verification example utilizes Tekla Tedds to check a slab on ground for single-axle loading with single wheels at each end. This example is based on Design Example A1.2 of the ACI 360R-10 Guide to Design of Slabs-on-Ground (page 58). Comparisons and contrasts are tabularized and discussed regarding the results from Tedds and the ACI Design Example. The Tedds file used in this example is provided in the Tedds “Select Calculation” window, under Verification Examples.

Problem statement

Determine the slab thickness due single-axle loading with single wheels at each end.

References

ACI 360R-10 Guide to Design of Slabs-on-Ground

Concrete Floors on Ground (2001) by PCA

Example information

Loading: Axle Load = 22.4 kips

Effective contact area of one wheel = 25 in2

Wheel spacing = 40 in.

Subgrade modulus, k = 200 lb/in3

Concrete compressive strength, f’c = 4,000 psi

Modulus of rupture = 9√f’c = 570 psi

Factor of safety = 1.7 (determined from ACI 360R-10 Table 5.2)

Notes

  • The procedure to determine slab on ground thickness for post loads utilizes design charts published by Portland Cement Association (PCA) in Concrete Floors on Ground (2001)

  • Both Tedds and the ACI design example utilize the PCA design charts found in ACI 360R-10 (Figures A1.1 and A1.2)

  • The thickness is based on limiting the tension on the bottom of the concrete slab.

Comparison of Results between Tedds and ACI 360R-10 Design Example A1.2
Component Tedds Result ACI Design Example 1.2 % Difference
Allowable stress 334.8 psi 335 psi 0.1%
Stress per 1,000 lb of axle load 14.9 14.96 (value of 15 was used) 0.4%
Required slab thickness 7.56” 7.75” 2.5%

Conclusion

Upon reviewing the results above, the determination of slab on ground thickness due to single-axle wheel loads by Tekla Tedds matches ACI 360R-10 design example A1.2. Differences between Tedds and the example can be attributed to rounding of values in the ACI design example.

Oliko tästä apua?
Edellinen
Seuraava